I find it hard to believe that the Yankees are seriously shopping Nick Swisher, as indicated by a published report this week. Swisher is currently the only outfielder with any kind of power on the 40-man roster—a fact that isn’t likely to change until the free agent situations of Johnny Damon and Hideki Matsui (if we can even consider him an outfielder anymore) are resolved. With the Yankees showing little interest in either Jason Bay or Matt Holliday, the prospects of a Melky Cabrera-Brett Gardner-Austin Jackson outfield would do little to ease the minds of nerve-wracked Yankee fans.
It’s easy to dismiss Swisher because of his poor postseason, which resulted in his benching in Game Two of the World Series, but that would be a short-sighted approach. This is the same Swisher who hit 29 home runs during the regular season, compiled a near .500 slugging percentage, played a far better right field than predecessor Bobby Abreu, and brought some much needed life and verve to a staid and stagnant clubhouse. Furthermore, Swisher seems to be genuinely liked by his Yankee teammates, in contrast to his days in Chicago, where some of the veteran White Sox resented his non-stop talking.
Then there are the matters of Swisher’s relative youth and his contract status. About to turn 29, Swisher is one of just four Yankee regulars who are under 30 (along with Mark Teixeira, Robinson Cano, and Melky Cabrera). Sure, I wish Swisher would have hit more in the postseason, but a 15-game slump should not completely override a productive regular season. I, for one, hope Swisher returns to the Yankee stable in 2010…
A potential trade between the Yankees and Tigers, centered on Curtis Granderson, has me torn. On the one hand, I love Granderson’s combination of power and speed, along with the vast range that he carries in center field. My sources with the Oneonta Tigers also rave about him from his days there; he’s highly intelligent and brings a good attitude to the ballpark. On the other hand, Granderson is older than I initially thought, with his 29th birthday arriving before Opening Day 2010. His on-base percentage also fell off badly this year, dropping from .365 to .327. Even at his best, Granderson is not particularly well-suited for the leadoff role the Tigers have given him; he’d be an ideal No. 6 hitter for a team like the Yankees.
Then there’s the matter of what the Tigers would want in return for Granderson. As much as they want to shed his long-term salary, they’d be crazy to just give him away for a package of Shelley Duncan and Ramiro Pena. The Tigers are probably going to want at least one player (and possibly two) from a group that includes Austin “Ajax” Jackson, Joba Chamberlain, Phil Hughes, and Zach McAllister. That may be too much for the Yankees to swallow. And if the Tigers insist on Jesus Montero, that demand should be a dealbreaker from the New York standpoint…
His passing didn’t create many headlines, but it did strike a chord with this writer. Former Yankee reliever Ron Klimkowski died last Friday at the age of 65, succumbing to heart failure. Initially signed by the Red Sox’ organization, Klimkowski came to the Yankees as one of the players to be named later in the Elston Howard deal. He pitched very well as a middle reliever in 1969 and ‘70, but was then traded to the A’s as part of the deal that brought Felipe Alou to New York. Klimkowski remained in Oakland until May of 1972, when the A’s released him; the Yankees signed him later that day. The timing wasn’t particularly good for Klimkowski, who missed out on Oakland’s world championship and then suffered a knee injury, which essentially ended his career.
Other than knowing that he was a junkball pitcher, I have no special insight on Klimkowski’s pitching career, but I do remember two things about him. First, I always used to confuse him with Gary Waslewski, another Yankee middle reliever of that era. (Like Klimkowski, Waslewski also pitched for the Yankees in 1970 and later spent some time in Oakland.) Second, I’ve always been intrigued by Klimkowski’s 1972 Topps card. Wearing the old-style green and gold combo that Charlie Finley loved so much, Klimkowski is sporting one of the widest grins I’ve ever seen on a baseball card. He looks absolutely thrilled to be photographed by the Topps cameraman.
Based on my memories of this card, I’ve always imagined that Klimkowski was one of the most fun-loving, outgoing players of his era. In reading about him in the obituaries reporting his death, those words seem to provide an accurate depiction of Klimkowski. In an interview with Newsday, longtime friend Tom Reilly, Jr. described him as “a charming and very gregarious individual. If you met Ron, you’d never forget him. He had a pretty overwhelming personality.”
Reilly also pointed out that Klimkowski was a lifelong Yankees fan, calling it a “blessing” that the retired right-hander had a chance to watch his former team win the World Series just a few weeks before passing away. It’s probably small consolation to his family and friends, but here’s hoping that the Yankees’ world championship made Ron’s final days a little more bearable.
Bruce Markusen writes “Cooperstown Confidential” for The Hardball Times.
I don't think they're "shopping" Swisher. It's just that he's available, like a lot of players on the team. They're not trying to get rid of him but he's not untouchable, is all.
I agree with [1]. The only thing I would add is that their payroll commitments for 2011 are already quite high w/o Jeter and maybe Mariano factored in, so if they wanted more payroll flexibility in 2011, now might be the time to move Swisher.
[2] How much is Swisher owed in 2011? About 5 million, I think...that's not opening up too much in terms of payroll flexibility.
I think that Swisher's name is being floated for, rather, the opposite reason: he's relatively inexpensive. In fact, he is one of the few tradeable commodities the Yankees have (excepting the young pitchers and guys on the farm). He's young, productive, and (fairly) cheap.
Who else could the Yankees trade? Whom else would anyone want or afford. Cano and Swisher are the only names that come to mind.
[3] 11:$9M
That's not insignificant.
[4] More than I thought. That's was a fairly back-loaded contract, hm. Still, who will take Swisher's 9 million off the Yankees' hands? If anything, they would have to eat the contract.
Swish gets $6.75m for 2010, $9m in 2011.
I wouldn't worry about it. Every player is ultimately "available" at this time of year. If Cashman doesn't put him out there he isn't doing his job. I think Swisher will stay given the production and the cost of it.
[5] I don't think anyone would, but my point has been that if they were gauging interest in Swisher, the amount owed in 20011 could be the reason why.
mlbtraderumors.com saying the Yanks "appear willing to part with Phil Hughes or Joba Chamberlain in the hunt for Roy Halladay" ... I know Joba was driving me nuts during the season, and I'd certainly rather part with him than Hughes at this juncture, but for some reason I want both guys to stay, for now. Maybe if Halladay was younger, though I imagine he'll be real good for three or four more years.
Re: Pitching, I'd rather invest in two "value" starter FAs like Harden and Sheets and keep Phil and Joba and consider those four to hold down two spots int he rotation (assuming Pettitte re-signs). Halladay is a great pitcher, but his best years are behind him now (not to say he's washed up), would rather keep our youth and play the value stocks. With the starting staff at least we have a solid foundation off of which to build.
The outfield is another issue ~ sure you listen to offers, that's part of what GMs do. But, like it or not, Swish is the cornerstone of the outfield right now. So, unless the yanks are planning other fairly large moves (not for Curtis Granderson, mind you), I wouldnt expect to see St Nick going anywhere. BTW, I am still a fan of the rent-a-cameron until Ajax is ready.