Roger Federer has never won the French Open. But he’s reached the finals and if he wins tomorrow he’ll tie Pete Sampras for the most all-time Grand Slams (Sampras never won the French either). I’ll be pulling for him.
Roger Federer has never won the French Open. But he’s reached the finals and if he wins tomorrow he’ll tie Pete Sampras for the most all-time Grand Slams (Sampras never won the French either). I’ll be pulling for him.
Me too. I'd like to have seen him get past Nadal, but that may be asking too much.
As a Swede, it is my duty to disagree with you.
I'm sure I'm alone in this, but I always find myself rooting for a champion at the end of his run. I rooted for Pete Sampras when Federer was taking his spot, and now I root for Federer as Nadal takes his spot. Strange, but that's probably one of the very few reasons I pay attention to tennis.
[3] That makes sense to me. Tennis is such a youth-oriented game, there's a certain romance to the guys and gals nearing the end of their careers, going for one ... last ... win!
I agree, Chyll. Agassi-Blake in the quarterfinals of the 2005 US Open was a perfect example of that. I stayed up until 2 AM to watch Agassi win 3-6, 3-6, 6-3, 6-3, 7-6 (8-6). And then came one of the best post-match lines ever:
"I wasn't the winner," Agassi told the cheering throng at Arthur Ashe Stadium. "Tennis was."